Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Start a Free Trial
See your data in HubiFi < 2 days
See your data in HubiFi < 2 days
Understand the percentage of completion method for revenue recognition in long-term projects. Learn when to use it and how to implement it effectively.
Managing long-term projects comes with its own set of financial complexities. How do you accurately track revenue and expenses when the work spans months or even years? The percentage of completion method revenue recognition offers a solution. Unlike methods that wait until the end of a project, the percentage of completion method recognizes revenue as you make progress. This provides a more realistic view of your financial performance over time. In this post, we'll explore the ins and outs of percentage of completion method revenue recognition, including how it works, when to use it, and how to calculate it correctly. We'll also discuss the challenges, benefits, and how it aligns with current accounting standards like ASC 606. By the end, you'll have a solid understanding of how this method can improve your financial reporting and give you better control over your long-term projects.
The percentage of completion method is an accounting method used to recognize revenue as a project progresses. Instead of waiting until a project is finished, revenue gets recognized based on how much work has been completed. This provides a more accurate picture of a company's financial performance over time, especially for long-term projects. Think of it like getting paid in installments for a job, rather than receiving one lump sum at the very end.
This method ties revenue recognition directly to the progress of a project. As costs are incurred and work is completed, a corresponding portion of the expected revenue is recognized. This differs from other methods that might delay revenue recognition until the entire project is finished. The percentage of completion method offers a clearer, real-time view of a project's financial impact. It’s about matching revenue with the expenses incurred during a specific period, giving a more accurate snapshot of profitability. This approach aligns with the core accounting principle of matching revenues and expenses. For more details, see this explanation of the percentage of completion method.
While commonly used in construction, the percentage of completion method is also applicable to other industries with long-term projects. Think defense contracting or large-scale software development projects. These industries often involve complex, multi-year contracts where recognizing revenue only upon completion wouldn't accurately reflect the ongoing work and associated costs. For these long-term projects, this method provides a more accurate and timely representation of financial performance, as explained in this article on the percentage of completion method. It allows businesses to see the financial impact of their work as it happens, rather than waiting until the very end. This real-time visibility is crucial for making informed business decisions and managing resources effectively. Learn more about how this method provides a more accurate view of financial health for companies with long-term projects from this resource on revenue recognition.
Knowing when to use the percentage of completion method is key for accurate revenue recognition. It’s not suitable for every project, so understanding the qualifying criteria is essential. Here’s a breakdown of when this method makes the most sense:
One of the most important factors is the ability to create reliable cost estimates for the entire project. As Investopedia explains, “[the company] must be able to reasonably estimate project costs and the rate of completion.” This accuracy is fundamental because your revenue recognition should reflect the actual progress. If your initial estimates are way off, your financial reporting will be distorted. Think of it like building a house—you need a solid blueprint and cost projections before you begin. Accurate cost estimation allows for a realistic view of the project’s profitability from the outset.
You also need reasonable assurance that you’ll receive payment for the work you complete. Again, from Investopedia, “collections from the client must be reasonably assured.” This doesn’t mean you need full payment upfront, but you should have a solid contract and a reliable client. This assurance is crucial to avoid recognizing revenue that might never materialize. Imagine completing 80% of a project only to discover your client can’t pay—your financial statements would show revenue that doesn’t exist. A clear payment schedule and a strong client relationship are essential for using this method effectively.
Finally, you need a way to reliably measure a project's progress. The percentage of completion method, as explained by Procore, “recognizes revenues and expenses of long-term contracts based on the percentage of work completed during a period.” This means you need clear milestones and a system for tracking completed work. Whether it’s miles of highway paved, lines of code written, or floors of a building completed, you need quantifiable progress indicators. This allows you to accurately tie revenue to the actual work performed. It’s also important to understand the IRS requirements and GAAP guidelines for using this method to ensure compliance. If you can’t reliably measure progress, this method won’t work.
This section breaks down how to calculate revenue using the percentage of completion method.
The most common way to measure the percentage of completion is the cost-to-cost approach. This method compares the costs you've incurred so far to the total estimated costs for the entire project. It's like tracking a road trip: you know the miles driven and the total distance, so you can figure out how far along you are. Similarly, the cost-to-cost method helps you understand how much of the project is financially "complete." This provides a reliable way to track progress, especially for long-term projects. For a more detailed explanation, take a look at the Corporate Finance Institute's resource on the percentage of completion method.
Calculating revenue with this method is straightforward. Divide the total costs incurred to date by the total estimated costs. This gives you the percentage of completion. Multiply this percentage by the total contract amount to find the revenue you can recognize. For example, if you've spent $50,000 on a $100,000 project, you're 50% complete. If the contract is worth $200,000, you can recognize $100,000 in revenue. Procore offers a helpful example of this calculation.
Accurate cost estimates are the foundation of proper revenue recognition. Your team needs to develop solid estimates for total project costs and diligently track actual costs throughout the project. Accurate tracking keeps your revenue recognition aligned with the project's true financial position. For further guidance on accurate cost estimation, explore RightRev's insights. Consistent and precise cost tracking is essential for the percentage of completion method to work well. Consider using project management software and strong internal controls to maintain accuracy and prevent future problems. This proactive approach helps you stay on top of your finances and make informed choices for your business. Schedule a data consultation with HubiFi to learn how our automated revenue recognition solutions can help.
Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the percentage of completion method is crucial for making informed decisions about your revenue recognition practices. Let's explore the benefits and drawbacks.
The percentage of completion method offers several key advantages, especially for long-term projects. Instead of waiting until the project's end to recognize revenue and expenses, this method distributes them across the project's timeline based on the work completed in each period. This provides a more accurate and timely view of your company's financial performance. For projects spanning multiple years, this approach offers a much clearer view than the completed contract method, which only recognizes revenue and expenses upon project completion. This real-time insight is particularly useful for long-term construction contracts and similar projects, painting a more realistic picture of your company's financial health. This transparency can also build trust with investors by providing a more consistent and predictable revenue stream. By recognizing revenue progressively, the percentage of completion method smooths out financial reporting, avoiding large fluctuations that might occur with other methods.
While the percentage of completion method offers significant advantages, it also presents certain challenges. One primary concern is the potential for manipulation. Because the method relies on estimations of project completion and costs, there's room for inaccurate accounting practices that could misrepresent a company's true financial performance. This risk underscores the importance of strong internal controls and regular audits. Another challenge lies in the complexity of accurately estimating project progress and costs. Inaccurate estimations can lead to issues like overbilling or underbilling, impacting cash flow and profitability. While the percentage of completion method is a widely accepted accounting practice, it's essential to ensure compliance with current accounting standards like ASC 606. These standards provide specific guidelines for revenue recognition, and adhering to them is critical for accurate and compliant financial reporting. Successfully implementing this method requires diligent tracking, consistent calculations, and potentially specialized software like HubiFi. Schedule a demo to see how HubiFi can simplify your revenue recognition process.
This section explores how the percentage of completion method aligns with accounting standards and its impact on your financial reporting.
Staying compliant with revenue recognition standards is crucial. The percentage of completion (PoC) method directly aligns with both ASC 606 and IFRS 15, the prevailing revenue recognition standards in the US and internationally. These standards provide a framework for recognizing revenue based on the transfer of control of goods or services to customers. Using the PoC method helps ensure your revenue recognition practices adhere to these guidelines, simplifying audits and promoting financial transparency. Both standards mandate that revenue from performance obligations satisfied over time, like long-term projects, should be recognized based on the percentage of completion. This approach offers a more accurate and consistent way to report financial performance.
The percentage of completion method significantly impacts how your company's financial health is perceived. Unlike recognizing revenue only upon project completion, the PoC method distributes revenue recognition across the project's lifespan. This provides a more accurate and transparent view of your financial performance, especially for long-term projects. As the Corporate Finance Institute explains, this method offers a more realistic snapshot of your company's financial standing, which can increase investor confidence. By accurately reflecting the ongoing progress of projects, the PoC method helps stakeholders understand the true financial state of your business. This transparency can also strengthen trust with investors and lenders. Accurate revenue recognition, a key component of the PoC method, is essential for informed decision-making and maintaining a healthy financial outlook. For high-volume businesses, accurately calculating the percentage of completion is even more critical, as small errors can compound and significantly impact overall financial results. This is where automated solutions, like those offered by HubiFi, can be invaluable. They help ensure precise calculations and streamline the entire revenue recognition process. Want to learn more? Schedule a demo with HubiFi today.
Implementing the Percentage of Completion (POC) method isn't always straightforward. It requires diligent tracking and careful calculations, and there are a few common pitfalls that can trip up even seasoned financial professionals. Let's break down some of these challenges:
The POC method relies heavily on accurate estimations of total project costs and the percentage of completion at any given point. If your initial estimates are off, your financial reports will be flawed. Inaccurate estimations can lead to misstated revenue and expenses, impacting profitability and potentially triggering compliance issues. As Procore points out in their explanation of the percentage of completion method, these inaccuracies can have a ripple effect across your financial statements. This makes rigorous planning and forecasting essential. For a deeper dive into forecasting, check out our resources on financial planning.
While the POC method can be a valuable tool for managing cash flow, it also presents some unique cash flow challenges. The revenue recognized might not align with the actual cash received, leading to discrepancies between reported profits and available funds. This can happen if you overbill or underbill clients based on inaccurate progress estimations. For example, if you overestimate the completion percentage, you might recognize more revenue than you've actually earned, creating a cash shortfall later on. Understanding these potential discrepancies is key to maintaining a healthy financial position. Procore also highlights the importance of understanding these cash flow risks. Learn more about how HubiFi can help you manage your cash flow effectively.
Accurately tracking project progress is the cornerstone of the POC method. This requires a reliable system for measuring progress, whether it's based on milestones achieved, labor hours incurred, or costs to date. Without a clear picture of how much work has been completed, calculating the percentage of completion becomes a guessing game. RightRev explains that accurate POC reporting is crucial for proper financial reporting and can even impact your ability to secure loans. Different projects may require different tracking methods. For some, the cost-to-cost approach might be appropriate, while others might benefit from a different methodology, as explained by CrewCost. Choosing the right approach and implementing it consistently is crucial for accurate and reliable financial reporting. Explore how HubiFi's integrations can streamline your progress tracking and revenue recognition processes.
Getting the percentage of completion method right requires a structured approach. Here’s how to implement it effectively:
Regular progress assessments are key to accurately applying the percentage of completion method. Since this method recognizes revenue and expenses based on the work completed during a specific period (usually monthly), consistent monitoring is essential. Think of it like checking in on a long-term project—regular updates give you a clearer picture of how things are progressing and allow you to make necessary adjustments. For more details on this method, Procore offers a helpful guide.
Accuracy in your financial reporting depends on consistent calculations. Establish a standardized way to determine the percentage of completion and stick with it. This ensures valid comparisons across reporting periods. However, don’t be afraid to revise your estimates if the project scope changes. Maintaining accurate accounting requires adapting to the realities on the ground. Procore provides further insights on maintaining accuracy in your calculations.
The percentage of completion method can be complex. Using specialized software can streamline the process and improve the accuracy of your revenue recognition. Think of it as having a dedicated tool to handle the heavy lifting. HubiFi offers automated revenue recognition solutions tailored for high-volume businesses, ensuring compliance with ASC 606 and other relevant standards. Explore HubiFi's integrations to see how it can fit into your existing systems.
Solid internal controls and ethical practices are your safeguards against misuse of the percentage of completion method. They’re like the guardrails that keep your financial reporting on track. These controls ensure accuracy and build trust in your financial statements. Investopedia offers a good overview of the importance of internal controls in financial reporting. For a tailored solution to strengthen your internal controls and ensure accurate revenue recognition, consider scheduling a data consultation with HubiFi. You can also learn more about HubiFi's pricing to see how it fits your budget.
Choosing the right revenue recognition method depends on your specific circumstances and the nature of your projects. While the percentage of completion method offers a more accurate picture of financial performance over time for long-term projects, it's not always the best fit. Let's compare it to two other common methods: the completed contract method and point-in-time recognition.
The completed contract method is pretty straightforward: you don't recognize any revenue or expenses until the project is completely finished. This means all the revenue, costs, and resulting profit are recorded in one lump sum at the very end. While this might seem simpler, it can create some issues. Imagine a multi-year project—your financial statements won't reflect any of the work done until it's finished. This can lead to fluctuations in reported income, making it difficult to track performance and make informed business decisions. As this Procore article explains, the completed contract method is often used when project outcomes are uncertain until the very end. However, for many businesses, the delayed recognition doesn't provide a timely view of financial health. For a clearer comparison of this method with the percentage of completion method, check out this helpful resource from Investopedia.
Point-in-time recognition sits on the other end of the spectrum. It's used for transactions that are completed relatively quickly, typically within a single reporting period. Think of selling a product directly to a customer—the transaction is complete at the point of sale, so you recognize the revenue right then and there. This method is much simpler than the percentage of completion method, as this RightRev resource points out. Under ASC 606, point-in-time recognition is appropriate when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer at a specific moment, as explained by the Corporate Finance Institute. This makes it a good fit for short-term contracts and straightforward sales, but not ideal for long-term projects where performance obligations are fulfilled over an extended period. The key difference between point-in-time and the percentage of completion method is the timing of revenue recognition: at a single point versus spread out over the project's duration. Choosing the right method is crucial for accurate financial reporting and informed decision-making. If you're dealing with long-term contracts and can reasonably estimate progress and costs, the percentage of completion method might be the better choice. However, for shorter, simpler transactions, point-in-time recognition offers a more practical approach.
Using the Percentage of Completion (POC) method successfully relies heavily on minimizing risks and maximizing accuracy. This means having the right processes and tools in place to support your team. Here’s how you can strengthen your approach:
Accurate POC reporting is the bedrock of sound financial reporting, and it can even be beneficial when you're securing financing for your projects. That's why training your staff is non-negotiable. Make sure your team understands the nuances of the POC method and how it impacts overall financial statements. A well-trained team can accurately track costs, estimate percentages of completion, and document everything properly. This reduces errors and ensures consistent application of the method. Consider incorporating practical exercises and real-world examples into your training program to solidify their understanding. For further insights into the importance of accurate POC reporting, check out this helpful resource on the percentage of completion method.
Even with a well-trained team, regular audits and reviews are essential. Think of them as a check-up for your financial reporting system. These reviews help maintain the integrity of your financial data and ensure you're complying with accounting standards. Strong internal controls and ethical practices are crucial to prevent misuse and ensure accurate financial reporting, as highlighted in this explanation of the percentage of completion method. Regular reviews can catch small errors before they become big problems, and they also reinforce the importance of accurate record-keeping across your team.
Staying up-to-date with the latest accounting standards is critical for accurate POC calculations. The percentage of completion method aligns with ASC 606 and IFRS 15, ensuring compliance with financial reporting standards. It's important to remember that these standards can evolve, so ongoing learning and adaptation are key. For a clear explanation of how to calculate revenue recognition using the POC method, take a look at this guide. While generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have evolved, contractors can still use the POC method while adhering to current standards. By staying informed and adjusting your practices accordingly, you can avoid discrepancies and maintain accurate financial reporting. Consider subscribing to industry publications or attending relevant webinars to stay on top of any changes. For more insights on streamlining your financial operations and ensuring compliance, explore the resources available on the HubiFi blog. HubiFi offers solutions designed to automate revenue recognition and simplify complex accounting processes. You can also schedule a demo to see how HubiFi can help your business.
The percentage of completion method, while established, isn't static. It continues to evolve alongside technology and accounting standards, impacting how businesses recognize revenue and manage projects.
Technology plays a crucial role in the future of the percentage of completion method. As projects become increasingly complex, accurate tracking and measurement of progress are essential. Managing a large-scale construction project or a multi-year software development contract generates mountains of data. Trying to manually calculate the percentage of completion in these scenarios is not only time-consuming but also prone to errors. This is where project management software and specialized revenue recognition solutions come in. These tools automate data collection and track costs, calculating the percentage of completion in real-time, leading to more accurate revenue recognition and better cash flow management. Platforms like Procore offer robust project tracking features, while software like RightRev simplifies the complexities of revenue recognition calculations. By leveraging these technological advancements, businesses can streamline their processes, reduce errors, and gain deeper insights into project performance.
Keeping up with evolving accounting standards is another key aspect of the future of the percentage of completion method. Standards like ASC 606 and IFRS 15 provide a framework for revenue recognition from customer contracts. These standards emphasize accurately depicting the transfer of control of goods or services to the customer. While the core principles of the percentage of completion method remain relevant, adhering to these evolving standards requires careful consideration of contract terms, allocation of transaction prices, and accurate cost estimation. Resources like those available on the Hubifi blog offer valuable insights into navigating these complexities. By staying informed about the latest standards and leveraging technology to ensure compliance, businesses can maintain financial transparency and build trust with stakeholders.
Why is the percentage of completion method preferred over waiting until the end of a project to recognize revenue?
The percentage of completion method gives you a much clearer picture of your financial health throughout a project, especially a long one. It spreads out the revenue recognition, matching it with the expenses you're incurring as you go. This approach smooths out your financial reporting and gives you a more realistic view of your profitability at any given point. Waiting until the end can create a distorted view, as all the revenue hits your books at once, regardless of when the work was actually done.
How do I know if the percentage of completion method is right for my business?
This method works best when you can reliably estimate the total project costs upfront, you're reasonably sure you'll get paid, and you have a way to measure how much of the project is complete. If your projects have unpredictable costs or if payment is uncertain, this method might not be the best fit. It's all about having enough information to make reasonable estimations.
What's the easiest way to calculate the percentage of completion?
The cost-to-cost method is the most common approach. Simply divide the costs you've incurred so far by the total estimated costs for the project. That gives you the percentage of completion. Then, multiply that percentage by the total contract value to figure out how much revenue you can recognize.
What are the biggest challenges with using this method, and how can I avoid them?
The biggest pitfalls are inaccurate cost estimations and inconsistent progress tracking. If your initial cost estimates are way off, your revenue recognition will be skewed. Similarly, if you don't have a reliable way to track progress, you won't be able to accurately calculate the percentage of completion. To avoid these issues, invest in good project management software, train your team on proper cost estimation and tracking procedures, and establish strong internal controls.
How does using the percentage of completion method ensure I'm following accounting rules?
This method aligns with current accounting standards like ASC 606 and IFRS 15. These standards provide guidelines for recognizing revenue, and the percentage of completion method helps you stay compliant, especially for long-term projects. By following this method correctly, you're demonstrating financial transparency and making it easier to pass audits. It shows that you're recognizing revenue in a way that reflects the actual work completed.
Former Root, EVP of Finance/Data at multiple FinTech startups
Jason Kyle Berwanger: An accomplished two-time entrepreneur, polyglot in finance, data & tech with 15 years of expertise. Builder, practitioner, leader—pioneering multiple ERP implementations and data solutions. Catalyst behind a 6% gross margin improvement with a sub-90-day IPO at Root insurance, powered by his vision & platform. Having held virtually every role from accountant to finance systems to finance exec, he brings a rare and noteworthy perspective in rethinking the finance tooling landscape.
Copyright © 2024 HubiFi | Powered by HubiFi
